Since i am kind of a structure-freak i always struggled with the right choice of software for screenwriting. Over the time i really tried a lot, from word-plugins to industry standard software, but for some reason i haven´t really been satisfied with any software i tried, till now.

Until i found the right thing for me i really tried almost any alternative, but none could compete with my latest choice, Movie Magic Screenwriter. But why? There are couple of solutions out there, but none of them fits the needs as MMS does.

As i evaluated the different options for me it was really hard to find useful statements or comparisons, so i thought it could be helpful for others who want to find the software that meets their expectations.

It is important to state that some applications i didn´t like so much could be the perfect choice for someone else, so at first i want to make clear what i expect from a screenwriting application and what i don´t need that much.

My requirements


Solid Outlining

This is in my opinion the most important feature, almost every screenwriting software offers good text editing, but when it comes to outlining it really narrowed my choices.

With a solid outline solution i don´t get lost in my screenplay and story development is made a lot easier.

Overall look-and-feel

It may sound a little kinky, but since you spend hours and hours with that software the overall usability and the look-and-feel should be really good. And since i´m used to Mac usability this is another obstacle in the choice of the proper software.

Small nifty features

There are plenty of small features that make the life of a screenwriter a lot easier, for example how to put notes in the script, how to keep an overview of the plot, etc.

These little features are another important factor for my choice.

What i don´t need


Production Tools

Since i´m not a professionall writer that makes a living out of writing screenplays i don´t really need production features for revisions that much right now.
Another thing is that the market in Austria is not that bitchy about such features or the overall format at all. Some of the great Austrian movies are written in Word, so i don´t have to think about that a lot.

Of course it is a nice-to-have for me, but not an important factor for my choice.

Export to scheduling software

Another nice-to-have feature, but not that important for me…

The industry standard

What i gathered during my evaluation is that every screenwriting software fits the requirements of the industry standard for screenplays, so that wouldn´t be an important factor in my choice neither.

So far my requirements, here the result of my evaluation, from place 6 to the winner.

Read the whole entry »

Although i am currently busy writing my feature (the austrian comedy if you remember) i delayed the development a little bit and started working an another project, a short movie.

My last short, Greener Pastures, premiered a year ago and i really really need to make another movie right now.

When i started to structure my ideas i more and more realized that i won´t be able to apply my structure methods for features on short movies, it just does not fit 100 percent. The article i wrote about my approach to structure a story can be found here, but as said at some points it just doesn´t fit when developing a story for a short movie.

The idea behing the structure of a short movie

Especially short movies tend to lack of structure, many people think that the principles of structuring a plot don´t apply to short movies, but in my opinion that´s just wrong. I think there are some factors that determine if there has to be structure or what kind of structure you need for your movie.

What kind of movie should it be?

The first thing we have to take into consideration is what kind of short movie we´re talking about, is it an experimental movie? Then do whatever you think is right, because the term “experimental” is almost a carte blanche for breaking the rules.

But when talking about live action short movies (or animated shorts, documentaries, etc.) you have to work with some methods. A commercial is not really considered a short movie, but even commercials work with a certain formula, so there definitely has to be some kind of structure for short movies.

The length of the movie

Another important factor is the length of the movie, there definitely is a difference if you write a 5 minute or a 25 minute movie. In general a movie is considered as short movie when it is less than 40 to 45 minutes long.

For shorts that are longer than, let´s say, 20 or 25 minutes it would be a good idea to try to apply the structure of a feature film (meaning act structure, exposition, inciting incident, turning points, etc.).

A short with a length of less than 20 or 15 minutes will be hard to structure this way, but that does not mean that there doesn´t have to be a structure at all.

Even the shortest movies need to have some kind of dramatic arc, in fact also jokes are written with a certain formula (have a look at this post from Amanda for example, a double punchline joke).

It is quite impossible to categorize short movies by their length to determine whether to apply this kind of structure or that one, i just wanted to point out that you probably have to adjust your approach of structuring a story to many factors, one of them is the length.

What the structure is for

Like feature films you probably want the audience to enjoy the short and get it´s message. In my opinion the reason of structure is to give the audience the feeling that there is some kind of conclusion in the movie and not just different frames strung together.

After watching the short the audience should be satisfied in some way, even if someone doesn´t like the topic the movie is about, he should not feel cheated afterwards. Don´t get me wrong here, it´s a good thing to confuse your audience, but in some way the plot has to be self-contained.

How to apply the structure?

So which structure do you apply to your short movie and how? There is not one straight way to go here, but there are several points you should consider if you want to apply the structure.

The Act Structure

Most of the feature films use some kind of act structure, be it three or five acts. Whenever i start to develop a story for a feature film one of the first things i do is to group different actions in different acts. So i think about what could be the exposition and the inciting incident, what is the turning point that brings us to the next act or what is the climax of the movie, how does it end?

This thinking is some kind of safety net for me, whenever i feel lost i have a look at my outline and it helps me to get back on track, but for a short movie that approach might not work.

Many times a short movie is not a complete plot like in a feature film, it is just an insight on the characters, a little part of their life and their story, let´s say it is a snapshot of a certain part of the whole.

So when it is impossible to categorize the plot in three acts, what should we do then? I think there are certain basics that need to be present, at least the beginning and the end.

Beginning and End

The beginning starts the movie, it doesn´t necessarily have to be an exposition in a traditional way, the beginning just throws the audience into the action. Like in the exposition the setting of the movie will be shown, just not so detailed. If there is no time to tell why your protagonist is in his current situation then don´t, he just is (but it should make sense). You could give some hints, and that would be the exposition.

The end is probably the most important part, it should be conclusive (even if it is an open end). Because if the end wouldn´t be satisfying in some way the movie would have no point.

What about the middle part?

Usually the second act is the hardest one, so what about short movies? Well, if there is a beginning and an end the thing that is in between is the middle ;)

But the good point is that you don´t really have to take care of a solid second act if the movie is too short for it, so you can save some plot points here.

If you happen to have enough time for a second act, go for it. Whenever there is time for a solid act structure it is worth it, but if not, a strong beginning and a solid end is sufficient.

The Turning Points

Inciting Incident, Act Turning Points, Climax, all of these might not be part of the short movie script, at least not in the traditional way. Of course there will be an inciting incident in some way, but probably it just doesn´t happen in the movie. Like i said before a short movie can also be seen as a snapshot of the current live of the protagonist (or the story), so it might be that your protagonist is already right in action.

As long as the beginning and the end is well constructed that´s ok.

The Character Arc

Just like the story, the characters probably don´t have enough time to develop in a short movie. It could be that the character didn´t change one bit in the short movie, but as i said before, short movies are sometimes just snapshots.

Subplots

If we are struggling to apply a structure to a short movie because of the length we don´t really have to think about that.

Subplots are a great thing to deepen the narrative of a feature film, give more insights into character relations or drive the story forward, but when there simply is no time for that we just don´t add any subplots.

Avoid long chunks of dialogue

Dialogue usually takes time plus there is the princible “show, don´t tell”, so you can save some time when you don´t put too much dialogue in your short movie script.

If you are smart you can transport more information in less time with showing instead of using long dialogue where one character explains the plot to another.

Conclusion

I don´t think there is a unique formular to structure every short movie, they just can be so vastly different, you have to decide for each story how to get a structured plot.

A short movie does not necessarily have to be a complete narrative, but it has to be self-contained in it´s own way (so it should at least have a beginning and an end).

You could for example take the battle of helms deep from The Lord of the Rings, this battle could be a stand-alone short movie.
You´d have to strip some stuff, probably add a little bit, but in the end you don´t need to know anything about the ring, the inciting incident does not happen in the short movie, but it is a self-contained and satisfying short with a dramatic arc, a beginning and an end.

Thats what i´m doing right now. Not really in a literal way, but nevertheless exhausting.

Although i´ve sworn myself not to work on any websites other than my own again i´m still doing it. I´m currently struggling to keep my creative mind over water and not drown in work that i really don´t like to do anymore.
To be honest it´s a little bit worse, there will always be work that you don´t want to do, but this is also work that doesnt have a benefit for me except a little money and there would be so much more interesting stuff to do right now.

But hey, that´s life, and i´m doing it for friends, that´s what i keep saying to myself. I think that´s part of the game, and if i´m really hardworking i can save my drowning creative mind out of the dirty water of work before it´s too late.

So then, back to into the slough…